A DORSET Police sergeant who was accused of 'gossiping' about killer Wayne Couzens has been given a final written warning.
Sergeant Simon Kempton was on secondment serving as treasurer of the Police Federation, the body representing officers in England and Wales, when Police Constable Couzens abducted and killed Sarah Everard.
A misconduct hearing was held at Dorset Police headquarters in Winfrith this week to consider allegations that Sergeant Kempton’s behaviour breached the appropriate standards of professional behaviour concerning authority, respect and courtesy, orders and instructions, duties and responsibilities and confidentiality.
It was alleged that Sergeant Kempton’s conduct was discreditable in that he failed to abide by the code of ethics, professional standards of behaviour and various codes and policies concerning the use of digital media.
Following the appearance of former Metropolitan Police officers Couzens at Westminster Magistrates Court on Saturday, March 13, who was charged with the kidnap and murder of Ms Everard, Sergeant Kempton posted a series of messages on a group chat in which he disclosed evidence that had been revealed during the hearing, which was subject to reporting restrictions.
The officer received the information from a Daily Mail journalist who attended Couzens’s first court appearance.
The panel found three of the standards of professional behaviour had been breached, namely discreditable conduct, duties and responsibilities and authority, respect and courtesy. Misconduct was found proven.
However, it found that the allegations in respect of breaches of the standards for orders and instructions and confidentiality were not proven.
In his mitigating submissions to the independent panel Sergeant Kempton showed remorse and apologised for his actions.
The officer received a final written warning, which will last for two years.
Following the hearing, Deputy Chief Constable Sam de Reya, Dorset Police’s lead for professional standards, said: “Our officers are duty bound to adhere to the highest standards of professionalism and integrity at all times, irrespective of whether they conduct their duties in Dorset Police or are seconded to another organisation.
“Following an independent investigation by the IOPC, this case was referred to an independently chaired panel, which made the decision that the officer had committed misconduct.
“It is disappointing that a hearing had to find an officer guilty of misconduct, especially as it was in relation to an abhorrent crime, where the reputation of the police service nationally was already very much under scrutiny.
“Locally and nationally the public expect and deserve to have trust and confidence in the police. This trust is immensely important to us and I hope the outcome of this case sends out a clear message that we take misconduct very seriously and will not tolerate any behaviour that falls below the standards expected.
“If you have any concerns in respect of any member of the organisation who is alleged to have failed to maintain the highest of standards and behaviour, we would encourage you to please report your concerns to Dorset Police so they can be thoroughly investigated.”
Dorset Police and Crime Commissioner David Sidwick said: “Dorset’s residents and communities deserve to have trust in their police service and every incident of this nature erodes that trust.
“Sergeant Kempton showed no regard to the abhorrent crime that was committed against Sarah Everard and has, quite rightly had to face the consequences of his actions.
“Both I and the Chief Constable take misconduct very seriously and I vow to work alongside him to ensure that the high standards that Dorset Police expects of its officers, staff and volunteers are upheld.”
A spokesperson for the Police Federation of England and Wales said: “PFEW believes it was vital Sgt Kempton fully briefed executive members with regards to the information he received.
"We note that any suggestions of gross misconduct have been rejected by the panel.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article