DON’T let an idiotic minority ruin seafront cycling for the rest of us – that’s the plea from local cyclists, who are concerned that a crackdown on speeding on the prom could lead to tighter restrictions in the future.
Cycling groups fear the health and environmental benefits of cycling are being forgotten in the bid to tackle irresponsible riders who break the 10mph speed limit.
Yesterday, the Daily Echo reported how speed cameras set up to catch those exceeding the limit caught 69 offenders in four days. There are also plans to fine those who breach the ban on cycling on the prom between 10am and 6pm during July and August.
Angela Pooley, co-ordinator of East Dorset Friends of the Earth, said they would be “extremely disappointed” if the current rules were changed.
“Prohibiting cycling altogether will not stop those intent on breaking the rules, only effective policing will do this.
“The seafront is an excellent safe commuting route for cyclists, and the facility must be retained.”
She said the majority of cyclists wanted safe on-road cycle lanes and improved junctions rather than shared routes on pavements.
Former councillor Dennis Gritt, who was on the council when the decision to allow cycling on the prom was made, said it had been an “outstanding success” for the majority of cyclists.
“The problem is the minority of idiots who abuse the privilege,” he said.
“Personally I feel the time has come to provide a cycle and land train dedicated lane on the sea side of the prom to cater for the increase in popularity of this lovely way of travel, fitness and eco-friendly pursuit.”
And Sustrans South West Regional Director Adrian Roper said: “Sustrans is always keen to promote safe and responsible cycling.
“We want to encourage people to use the prom for their daily journeys and for enjoyment, both on foot and by bike and it is important that people take other users into consideration when they are out and about.”
The issue has sparked fierce debate on the Echo’s website.
One cyclist, poolebabe, Poole, said: “Cyclists have to be careful or lose the right to cycle.
“The rules ARE the rules and if people cannot abide by the rules for such a privilege, they deserve to be fined and banned.”
Sollie said: “If there is a risk of accidents then the authorities should do something to reduce the risk, like zoning cycle paths. What they are doing is alienating another section of the community.
“Cycling should be encouraged along this stretch of the borough. This route takes cyclists off busy roads between Christchurch and Poole, where the risk of serious injury is far greater.”
Perry_Winkle, Poole said: “Agree entirely that those breaking the rules should be punished, but absolutely NOT that all cyclists should be punished for the misdeeds of the few.
"Are we going to ban shoppers from stores because some people nick stuff from them?”
Bournemouth resident, Bournemouth, said: “I am a cyclist and do keep to the 10mph limit along the promenade. I dismount if it’s busy. 69 offenders in four days is terrible, totally unacceptable. With no fine possible there is no alternative but a blanket ban. Sadly it’s inevitable.”
And Glashen, Christchurch, said: “I actually agree cyclists who disobey the speed limit or endanger pedestrians should be fined, but I don’t agree that pedestrians and all vehicles can or should be kept completely apart.
“This was the ’70s and ’80s creed, but it doesn’t work.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel